There are many interview articles of celebrities such as entertainers and artists on magazines and the Internet, but even if you read the articles of celebrities you are interested in, you may not be convinced, or even if you finish reading, it may be incomplete combustion. Isn’t that?
Whether or not you can draw out attractive words in an interview is a great pleasure for the interviewer, and it is a place where your ability is tested.
However, if you do not appeal to the other person’s heart from the reader’s point of view, you will not be able to take full advantage of the interview opportunities you have obtained.
So, I heard from a person who has been a writer for 20 years, 5 points that the interviewer will do it, and if you do this, you will not be able to draw good words so that you will not make such a mistake. I will introduce it.
[Don’t do 1] Know the other person too much in advance
It is natural to keep in mind the basic information of the person to be interviewed in advance, but if you stuff the information in your head more than necessary, you will lose sight of the essence of the interview.
Let’s keep the introduction down and prepare so as not to delve into each theory.
The mission of the interviewer is to pick up the voice of the interviewee on behalf of the reader.
With the stance of “I know,” you can’t get to the information that readers really want to know. In some cases,
“Did you come to the interview without knowing that?”
Even in such a case, it is important to listen from the standpoint of “I’m sorry for not studying.”
[Don’t do 2] Rely on recording equipment
It is impossible to take notes of conversations word for word unless you are a master of shorthand.
In such a case, the IC recorder is very effective.
Being able to focus on conversations and questions instead of focusing on notes is also a big advantage of recording.
But don’t let your guard down just because you can listen again later.
The interview is live. It is the role of the interviewer to create the atmosphere of the place, and the best part is how much the sense of presence can be contained in the manuscript.
It is recommended that you proceed with the interview while taking notes as much as possible, and do not rely on recording at first, if possible, before the heat of the interview cools down. To do.
If you really want to check the part, check it by recording.
By doing so, the melancholy of transcription will be resolved and it will be two birds with one stone.
[Don’t do 3] Overfill the silence with conversation
Being stuck in a question is one of the predicaments for interviewers.
But don’t hate the delay in conversation and ask the other person a nonsensical question.
Rather than getting empty answers to nonsensical questions, you need to give the other person time to think.
By creating a gap in the conversation, you may be able to draw out unexpected quotes that you have never seen in any article.
[Don’t do 4] Guided cross-examination
It is good if the interviewee is accustomed to interviewing, but if the interviewee is not accustomed to speaking, it may be difficult to get an answer or the story may go in an unexpected direction.
In the extreme, it’s not uncommon to say “yes” to “no.”
However, many of these causes are actually on the interviewer’s side.
“What is XX?” “I think it is XX.”
I sometimes ask such questions, but it is not a good question.
This is because it involves the possibility of unknowingly imposing the interviewer’s opinions and thoughts.
The more unfamiliar the subject is with the interview, the more courage to give the other person time to think.
[Don’t do 5] The question “What does XX mean to you?”
This is a question I often hear in TV interviews. For example, for musicians
“What does music mean to you?”
It is a question like asking.
To the interviewer, it may seem like a special question to get a word for you.
However, imagine that you were asked the same thing from the standpoint of the person being interviewed.
No one will be able to give a dramatic answer instantly.
The question “What does XX mean to you?” Does not work at all unless the answer is well prepared.
In other words, like TV and radio, in most cases it will not be possible unless we have a meeting in advance to ask such a question today.
As I said earlier, the interview is live.
If you want to know the answer to “What is XX for you?”, The interviewer’s best job is to bring it to light from the many words I received during the 30-minute or 1-hour interview. is.
If you can’t come up with the answer in a given amount of time, it’s an interviewer’s lack of competence.
[Extra edition] Mistakes that editors and publishers tend to make
Interviews are usually conducted with the media staff who write the interview, or the staff of the interviewee, but in the process leading up to the day of the interview, the interviewee and the editor Often, well-known stories have not been passed on to the interviewers.
On the other hand, when the interviewer asks a question, the editor may break it from the side and start talking, “That’s right”, but from the interviewer’s point of view, I want to hear it in his own words! That is the real intention.
As an editor, you may feel guilty about what you didn’t tell, but once the interview starts, I’ll leave everything to the interviewer, and I’d like to ask you to attend.
In the days when there was no internet, I sometimes gathered up all the information and managed to arrange the appearance of the interview.
For example, I met the editor on the 1st floor of the building where I was interviewing, and in the elevator until I went up to the interview room on the 5th floor, I read the materials for only a few seconds and went to the interview. It was a tightrope walk.
Now is the time when information is overflowing. On the contrary, it is necessary to take pride in selecting accurate and effective information from the surplus information and listening on behalf of all readers.
That’s important to make the limited interview time dense.